Abolition of the Death Penalty Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Abolition of the termination penalisation - Essay ExampleMeans of capital penalty include but non limited to hanging, crucifixion, electrocution, kill etc. Van Den Haag gives five reasons justifying the constitutionality of the stopping point penalty by concluding that the constitution allows for decease penalty which is not the case (van den hag 128).The constitution states that if life was to be taken apart as form of punishment, so it must be in accordance with the due process of the constabulary, this pro couch is conditional and accords the government a choice to either abolish it or effect it in light of the due process of the law. For this reason I wish to put forth arguments that would lead to the abolition of last penalty. Dissenting Van den hag argues that the death penalty acts as dissuaderence for approaching shoots. Death being the most severe form of punishment is most fe argond and a murder would conceptualise before carrying out his intention. Previous s tudies have shown that quiet a number of murders were deterred since the introduction of death excoriate. However, the death sentence takes quiet a long time before it is administered and the use of alternative equally feared forms of punishments could be used instead as a form of deterrence. Deterrence has its limitations as someone already incarcerate and sentenced for death would not be afraid to kill their inmates as well as the prison guards. Death sentence can only be effective in deterring murders if it is carried out fast enough which is commonly not the case. Retributive justice comes into play when an imbalance occurs in society due to a going away of life from the hands of a criminal. That balance must be restored by taking away the murderers life. concur In rebuttal to deterrence, the death sentence has not been proven to deter future murders. The difference surrounded by life imprisonment and death sentence is negligible. Death sentence can have the effect of brut alizing the society, which then makes it a less effective tool for deterring murder as this increases the possibility of more murder (Anckar, 2004, 189). to the highest degree murders are get offted by people in altered states of mind. It might be that a individual acted in moments of immense emotional imbalance due to anger or substance abuse. Also, the person committing murder does not expect to be found out. It would be suffice to say that the death sentence cannot deter such persons or drug abusing criminals from committing murder as they are not in a position to evaluate the possibility of life imprisonment or the death penalty itself. The death penalty has not been proven to deter more murders than life imprisonment, as most prisoners serving life imprisonment are involved in routine works and like any other prisoner, they are unlikely to commit any crime. Peoples security can be guaranteed by offering life sentence without parole without having to use the death penalty (Ba e,2007, 235). Long-term imprisonment being a severe punishment can deter any rational human being from committing murder however this is not attainable as most premeditated murders involve a criminal who is planning on not acquire caught or people who murdered out of sheer emotion.. Police in states with the death penalty are not invulnerable compared to police officers in abolitionist states. Also, prison personnel and prisoners are not safe in states with the death penalty than those without. (Wolftson, 1982, 167) In rebuttal to retribution, Sanctity of life should not be compromised to death penalty. Retribution being akin to visit should not be exercised by a civilized society. seat of government punishment has so many problems and risks associated with it and the need for vengeance should not justify its existence. Sanctioning killing for revenge motives lowers the dignity of a mature society which is